How Britain Quietly Controls America: Warner, Fitzpatrick, Pulte, and the Hidden Empire

Most people who sense that “something else” controls American politics are told to blame Israel or a faceless deep state. This article makes a different case: that the real long‑term steering power sits in London, inside a British imperial system that never truly ended. Using the Warner–Fitzpatrick war on Acting DNI Bill Pulte as a case study, we trace how British finance, intelligence, and Atlantic strategy have quietly shaped U.S. wars, alliances, and even the Russia Hoax at home.

How England, Not Israel, Has Quietly Controlled U.S. Power

For years, Americans who sensed that something was deeply wrong in our politics were told to look in the wrong direction. They were told Israel “controls” the United States, or that a vague “deep state” exists with no history and no address. Meanwhile, the real story sat hiding in plain sight: the modern United States has been operating for decades inside an imperial system whose center of gravity sits not in Washington or Tel Aviv, but in London.

The recent clash over Acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte, highlighted in the Promethean Action videos featuring Sen. Mark Warner and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, is one small but vivid window into that larger fight. On the surface, it looks like a partisan brawl about Donald Trump, the “Russia Hoax,” and control over the intelligence community. But when you fit it into a longer story of British imperial strategy, trans‑Atlantic finance, and NATO’s grip on U.S. foreign policy, it begins to look less like random chaos and more like the defense of an old empire that never died—only changed its costume.

The Russia Hoax As A British Project

The first of your videos shows Promethean Action explaining how Sen. Mark Warner, as a key figure on the Senate Intelligence Committee, helped keep the Russia‑collusion narrative alive long after it should have collapsed under its own weight. The “Russia Hoax” justified years of investigations, surveillance, and media frenzy against Trump and anyone trying to change U.S. foreign policy. It painted any move toward cooperation with Russia as treasonous, and it gave cover for the intelligence community to spy, leak, and prosecute under the banner of “defending democracy.”

From a conventional viewpoint, this was just Democrats and Never‑Trump Republicans going too far. But Promethean‑style analysis makes a stronger claim: the hoax functioned as a domestic extension of a British‑designed geopolitical strategy that requires permanent hostility between Washington and Moscow. For the better part of a century, British grand strategy has depended on preventing a durable partnership between continental Eurasia and the United States, because such a partnership would sideline London’s role as broker and middleman.

Seen that way, the Russia narrative was never simply “about Trump.” It was about enforcing an old imperial rule: America may be powerful, but it must never be truly independent in its foreign policy. It must stay locked into an Atlantic system whose assumptions and priorities were written in London, not in Philadelphia.

The Special Relationship: How An Empire Survived Defeat

To understand how England could still be steering U.S. policy, you have to go back to the end of World War II. On paper, the British Empire was finished. The United States emerged as the dominant military and industrial power. But empire is not just about flags and colonies; it is about who controls finance, law, intelligence networks, and the basic assumptions of foreign policy.

The so‑called “Special Relationship” between Britain and the United States allowed the British elite to wrap its fading empire around the body of a rising superpower. London surrendered the appearance of imperial control while preserving a deeper kind of influence:

• The City of London remained a core hub of global finance, especially offshore and derivatives markets.

• British intelligence services maintained tight integration with their American counterparts, shaping analysis and priorities through the Five Eyes network.

• Atlanticist think tanks and policy circles, many with British roots or guidance, framed NATO expansion, interventionism, and “rules‑based order” as unquestionable truths.

In this system, Washington pays the bills and fights the wars, but the overall map—the enemies, the alliances, the red lines—is drawn by an imperial mindset that never truly stopped being British. What people mistakenly attribute to “Israel controlling America” is, in this perspective, one regional outgrowth of a larger Anglophone imperial architecture, with London as the intellectual and financial command center.

Why The Focus On Britain, Not Israel?

Many Americans have noticed the outsized influence of pro‑Israel lobbying, media framing, and military aid, and they conclude that Israel must “control” U.S. policy. That observation is not baseless—but it is incomplete. It treats Israel as the top of the pyramid rather than a node within a much older and broader network centered on Britain and its Atlantic partners.

Promethean‑style arguments flip the script in three key ways:

• They point out that the Anglophone world, not Israel, built and still dominates the legal, financial, and military infrastructure of the current global order.

• They show that NATO and British‑led Atlantic strategy set the basic parameters of U.S. foreign policy long before Israel became a major ally.

• They emphasize that the same elites who run City of London finance and British‑influenced institutions see Israel, the Gulf monarchies, and even parts of the EU as pieces on a larger imperial chessboard.

From this angle, Israel is influential but not sovereign over U.S. power. The deeper continuity lies with the British imperial mind—the one that has spent over a century perfecting indirect control: shaping other nations’ choices so they behave like extensions of British strategy without needing a Union Jack flying over their capitals.

Warner, Fitzpatrick, And The Panic Over Pulte

This is where your two videos come back into focus. In them, Promethean Action lays out how Warner and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick have gone into overdrive to stop Bill Pulte from taking effective control as Acting Director of National Intelligence. Why would two members of Congress be so desperate to block one man from accessing intelligence files and FISA oversight?

The answer, in this framework, is that Pulte represents a direct threat to the machinery that kept the decade‑long war on Trump running. As Acting DNI, he would have the authority to:

• Declassify key documents on the origins of the Russia investigation and related FISA warrants.

• Expose coordination between U.S. and allied (including British) intelligence services in targeting Trump’s campaign and presidency.

• Oversee a proposed 1.8 billion dollar fund designed to help victims of political lawfare, potentially redirecting resources away from the networks that weaponized courts and prosecutions in the first place.

If you assume the real architecture behind the Russia Hoax was trans‑Atlantic, not purely domestic, then Warner and Fitzpatrick aren’t just protecting “Democrats” or “the establishment.” They are defending an entire imperial system from being dragged into the light.

Lawfare, FISA, And The City Of London

One of the most revealing aspects of this story is how it links intelligence abuses, financial power, and lawfare. Promethean briefings argue that you cannot separate the misuse of FISA and the intelligence community from the global financial system headquartered in the City of London. Intelligence sharing, sanctions, and “counter‑terrorism” mechanisms are routinely used to pressure governments, corporations, and individuals who step outside the approved geopolitical script.

The proposed 1.8 billion dollar fund for lawfare victims, which Pulte could help oversee, is an implied admission that political warfare through courts and prosecutions has been real and devastating. If even a fraction of that lawfare is traced back to trans‑Atlantic coordination against Trump and his movement, it exposes not just partisan dirty tricks but the operating system of British‑anchored imperial control:

• Intelligence used to fabricate or exaggerate threats.

• Courts used to ruin targeted figures financially and reputationally.

• Media used to reinforce the narrative and frame dissent as “extremism” or “foreign influence.”

That is why stopping Pulte matters so much to Warner, Fitzpatrick, and the interests behind them. If the chain from bogus intelligence to political lawfare to financial pressure is ever documented end‑to‑end, it becomes obvious that American sovereignty has been compromised at the structural level.

War Plan Red And The Forgotten Enemy

Promethean Action often references “War Plan Red,” an old U.S. military contingency plan from the early 20th century that treated the British Empire as a potential strategic adversary. The point is not that America should literally dust off those plans, but that there was once a time when U.S. leaders clearly understood that British interests were not automatically identical to American interests.

Over the decades, that clarity was deliberately erased. The Special Relationship was sold as a permanent alliance of “values,” even as British‑driven NATO expansion, European wars, and financial schemes like the petrodollar and dollar‑sterling arrangements locked the U.S. into strategies that served London’s worldview. In that context, the current clash over Trump, NATO, Russia, and the Middle East is not a random sequence of crises. It is the unraveling of an 80‑year arrangement in which the United States functioned as the muscle of a British‑led order.

Trump, The New Alignments, And Britain’s Losing Hand

Promethean analysis argues that Trump’s attempts to realign U.S. foreign policy—reducing dependence on NATO, pursuing deals with Russia and parts of the Global South, and challenging the old energy and trade regimes—have thrown the British‑run system into panic. The Russia Hoax, the lawfare blitz, and now the attempt to block Pulte are different phases of the same defensive reaction.

Recent briefings describe how new alliances are emerging that Britain “can’t stop,” including deals that sidestep traditional petrodollar and London‑centric financial structures. As other countries look for alternatives to the old trans‑Atlantic order, the British establishment is running out of cards to play. That is why keeping America locked inside the legacy system—through NATO commitments, intelligence entanglements, and political warfare against any reform movement—is so vital to them.

The Real Question: Who Governs America?

When you put all of this together, the controversy in your two videos becomes more than an inside‑baseball fight over one appointment. It becomes a test of who truly governs the United States. Is it the American people through their elected president and transparent institutions, or is it a trans‑Atlantic empire that survived the formal end of British colonialism by moving into finance, intelligence, and “rules‑based order” rhetoric?

Blaming Israel for everything may feel emotionally satisfying to some, but it misses the deeper architecture. The continuity of strategy, finance, and covert influence runs back to London, not Tel Aviv. The actors on your screen—Warner, Fitzpatrick, and the forces trying to stop Bill Pulte—are best understood as local managers of a system that wants the United States powerful, but never truly free.

If America is going to break that pattern, it will require more than one appointment or one scandal. It will mean exposing the full history of trans‑Atlantic manipulation, declassifying the real story behind the Russia Hoax and lawfare, and then rebuilding foreign and domestic policy on a genuinely sovereign American footing. Your article, your site, and these videos can be part of that reckoning—if readers are willing to ask the forbidden question: not “Who did Britain conquer?” but “Where does the British Empire still rule, without anyone daring to name it?”

Videos used for the Article: https://x.com/PrometheanActn/status/2064074490020000056 https://x.com/PrometheanActn/status/2064762348125225150